Commentary for Bava Kamma 115:8

ירדה כדרכה והזיקה משלמת מה שהזיקה: בעי רבי ירמיה ירדה כדרכה והזיקה במי לידה מהו

But the one who explains the ruling to apply where it slipped in its own water [might maintain that] where another animal pushed it down there was negligence, and the payment should be for the amount of damage done by it, as the plaintiff would be entitled to say, 'You should have made them go past one by one.'

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 115:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.